Automated History Matching
Tunes the reservoir model until it reproduces what the field actually produced, automatically and with the uncertainty kept rather than discarded.
Works out which injector is actually supporting which producer, and where the injected water is being wasted.
Injection is allocated by pattern geometry drawn on a map, but real connectivity follows faults and high-permeability streaks. Water is routinely injected into wells that support nothing, at a real cost in power, chemicals and disposal.
Capacitance-resistance modelling and signal correlation between injection and production rates infer inter-well connectivity from the production data itself, independently of the geomodel. Voidage replacement is tracked by pattern and the results are reconciled against tracer surveys where they exist.
Capacitance-resistance modelling needs rate variation to infer connectivity. In a field operated at steady rates for years, the signal is too weak and the method returns connectivity estimates with confidence intervals wide enough to be useless — in which case the honest recommendation is a designed rate-perturbation test, not a longer analysis.
Every capability page states a real limitation. If a vendor cannot tell you where their product stops, you are not being told the truth about where it starts.
Tunes the reservoir model until it reproduces what the field actually produced, automatically and with the uncertainty kept rather than discarded.
Splits the metered facility total back to individual wells with a documented, repeatable method instead of a spreadsheet nobody can audit.
Predicts where a line is corroding fastest and how long it has left, so inspection and replacement go where the risk actually is.
Searches injection strategies — what to inject, where, and at what rate — against recovery and cost together.
When a well drops, it names the likely cause — scale, water breakthrough, lift failure, choke or reservoir — instead of only flagging the drop.