Field Safety Computer Vision
Uses the cameras already installed to spot missing protective equipment, people in restricted zones and unsafe proximity to lifting operations.
Knows who is on site and roughly where, so a muster after an alarm takes minutes instead of a headcount by radio.
Emergency muster depends on a paper sign-in sheet and radio roll-call. Accounting for everyone takes far longer than the procedure assumes, and the time is spent exactly when it is least available.
Bluetooth or ultra-wideband tags on badges and mobile equipment are read by gateways at access points and in process areas, giving zone-level presence rather than continuous precise tracking. Zone-level resolution is a deliberate choice: it is what emergency response needs and it limits the surveillance capability of the system.
Zone-level tracking tells you someone is in an area, not their exact position, and it depends on the tag being worn. This is also a system with real privacy implications and it must be introduced with a written policy on retention and permitted use, agreed with the workforce, or it will be defeated in practice regardless of what the technology can do.
Every capability page states a real limitation. If a vendor cannot tell you where their product stops, you are not being told the truth about where it starts.
Uses the cameras already installed to spot missing protective equipment, people in restricted zones and unsafe proximity to lifting operations.
Moves permits and isolation certificates off paper, so conflicting work on the same equipment is blocked automatically rather than caught by memory.
Watches the flare on camera to confirm it is lit, estimate how much is being burned, and detect smoking or incomplete combustion.
A technician photographs a nameplate and the equipment record is created or matched, instead of being typed from memory later.