Optimización de Estrategia EOR/IOR
Searches injection strategies — what to inject, where, and at what rate — against recovery and cost together.
Evaluates whole development concepts — well count, phasing, facility size — as one connected problem instead of four separate studies.
Subsurface picks the well count, facilities sizes the plant for it, and economics evaluates the result. Each hands over a fixed answer, so the coupling between them — which is where most of the value sits — is never explored.
A coupled model links subsurface forecast, facility capacity, drilling schedule and cash flow, and an optimiser searches concepts across well count, phasing, plant capacity and injection strategy. Results are presented as a concept-comparison surface with the dominant trade-off named.
The optimiser is only as credible as the cost curves it is given, and early-phase facility cost estimates carry error bands wider than the differences between the top concepts. Used to rank concepts and identify the decisive uncertainty it is valuable; used to produce a single NPV number for an investment case it is misleading, and we do not supply it for that purpose.
Cada página de capacidad declara una limitación real. Si un proveedor no puede decirle dónde termina su producto, no le están diciendo la verdad sobre dónde empieza.
Searches injection strategies — what to inject, where, and at what rate — against recovery and cost together.
Searches for where the next wells should go, with drilling feasibility and surface constraints inside the search rather than applied afterwards.
Plans crew, vehicle and material movements across the field so that fewer kilometres are driven, which is also the largest safety exposure most operators have.
A learned stand-in for the full reservoir simulator that answers in seconds instead of hours, so an engineer can test fifty scenarios instead of three.
Tunes the reservoir model until it reproduces what the field actually produced, automatically and with the uncertainty kept rather than discarded.