Rules out the EOR methods that cannot work in this reservoir before anyone spends a year simulating them.
Screening is still done against published criteria tables from the 1980s, applied by hand, with no record of why a method was dropped. The same argument is then re-run two years later.
Reservoir and fluid properties are scored against both classical screening criteria and a database of field-scale outcomes, producing a ranked shortlist with the specific disqualifying property named for every rejected method. Minimum miscibility pressure is computed rather than assumed.
Screening criteria are statistical generalisations from mostly North American sandstone experience. Fractured carbonates, which dominate this region, are badly represented in the published criteria, and we weight the analogue database more heavily than the criteria tables for those reservoirs and label the result accordingly.
Cada página de capacidad declara una limitación real. Si un proveedor no puede decirle dónde termina su producto, no le están diciendo la verdad sobre dónde empieza.
Extracts fluid study data from decades of laboratory reports and tunes the equation of state against all of it, not against the one report someone had to hand.
Searches injection strategies — what to inject, where, and at what rate — against recovery and cost together.
Finds the bad intervals in the log archive and reconstructs curves that were never run, so the field has a complete set to work from.
Fits decline curves across every well in the field on a consistent basis and keeps the audit trail that a reserves report needs.